P.I.P.

31 sec.
“This is a picture in a picture; a phrase within a phrase.” Brief bracketing of audio and video in this performance piece; my wife calls this “tongue in cheek” production my “infantile regression.”  I wanted to put it on a loop but the technology was not there at the time.

cf. another kind of bracketing from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia:

Bracketing (German: Einklammerung; also called epoché, transcendental reduction, or phenomenological reduction) is a term in the philosophical school ofphenomenology describing the act of suspending judgment about the natural world to instead focus on analysis of experience.

Phenomenology, developed by Edmund Husserl (1859–1938), can be understood as an outgrowth of the influential ideas of Immanuel Kant (1724-1804). Attempting to resolve some of the key intellectual debates of his era, Kant argued that Noumena (objects of inquiry, investigation or analysis of the workings of the world) must be distinguished from Phenomena (noumenon as experienced and interpreted by the human mind). Kant thus argued that humans can never have direct access to reality, but only to the contents of their minds.

Bracketing involves setting aside the question of the real existence of a contemplated object, as well as all other questions about the object’s physical or objective nature; these questions are left to the natural sciences.

For example, the act of seeing a horse qualifies as an experience, whether one sees the horse in person, in a dream, or in a hallucination. ‘Bracketing’ the horse suspends any judgement about the horse as noumenon, and instead analyses the phenomenon of the horse as constituted in intentional acts.

Bracketing may also be understood in terms of the phenomenological activity it is supposed to make possible: the “unpacking” of phenomena, or, in other words, systematically peeling away their symbolic meanings like layers of an onion until only the thing itself as meant and experienced remains. Thus, one’s subjective intending of the bracketed phenomenon is examined and analyzed in phenomenological purity.

This entry was posted in Adventures in Creativity, Multimedia, Performance piece, philosophy, Video. Bookmark the permalink.